class: top, left, inverse, title-slide # Education & Globalization ## Session 26 ### Dr. Zhou Yisu 周憶粟 ### 2018/11/19 --- # Learning without boarders ## Aims To identify limitation of traditional learning To articulate why schools are reluctant to change To understand how new forms of learning is transforming education --- ## To recap Last Thursday we talked about university as a global institution with goals of producing and spreading knowledge. -- In order to achieve this goal, as well as nurturing a particular type of young talent: .violet[those who have built-in capacities and interests to understand all aspects of social and natural reality], we also needs a new kind of pedagogy. -- But in reality, only a handful of institutions are teaching in such a way. In many places, teaching & learning remain largely the same as those in secondary schools. ??? I for one, was quite dreadful of the university experience I receive. The professors I encountered seems less interested to connects or even talk to me than finishing up his lectures. --- ## The form of teaching & learning Let us be reminded what classroom teaching is back in 1999 <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/yPY3eItHdjc" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe> ??? For demonstration, watch through 6:00 mark --- ### Similarity of teaching & learning across the world What does teaching & learning have in common? - Classroom - Lecture - Textbook - Homework -- Assumptions of teaching & learning: - The structure of knowledge is linear 知識結構的線性 - The structure of classroom is conformative 課堂組織結構的一致性 ??? The worst part maybe: to acquire knowledge is simply transmit it from one place (the instructor) to another (the student). As I saw a couple of weeks ago on mid-term exam paper on the desk of this classroom. --- background-image: url(https://i0.wp.com/vrworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/University.jpg) background-size: contain ??? University of Bolona, founded in AD 1088. Painting done in 14th century --- background-image: url(http://i1.wp.com/inews.gtimg.com/newsapp_match/0/303404218/0) background-size: contain ??? Confucius, about 500 BC I always wonder if this is a glorified version of the actual teaching. No one fell asleep? --- ## Questions yet to be answered .orange[Is this model of teaching & learning effective?] - Does it improve learning efficiency? 提升學習效率嗎? - Does it improve learning motivation? 是否促進學習的動力? - Does it improve student ability? 是否促進學生的能力? -- .orange[Could this model of teaching & learning produce the ideal person we want?] --- ## Modern schooling: bring education to the mass  .footnote[Image: Monitorial Schools: Paid one teacher to instruct hundreds using student teacher or monitors. Taught basics of reading writing and arithmetic.] --- background-image: url(https://enoughisenough14.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/school.jpg) background-size: contain ??? Education is primary domestic policy. In this regard, I appreciate the impact PISA brought to our current school system because if you wait for the happen from within, it might take a long period of time. University is supposed to be this trailblazer that brings changes. But again, university is largely walled-off from elementary and secondary schools. Such that the change impact could be directly transmitted. --- ## Changing the format: failed attempt (1)  .footnote[Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimally_invasive_education] --- ## Failed attempt (2): replace textbooks with laptop  --- class: middle ##The format of teaching & learning is stubbornly reluctant to change, because they are: - Cheap to implement - Socially accepted - Results are difficult to measure - Produce predictable token: credential (i.e. degrees) --- ## Changes came from outside of school  --- ## Salman Khan's idea He worked in a hedge fund in 2004 as an analyst. He was tutoring his cousins at home after work. He found the instruction repetitive and not efficient: - Record his lecture as video and upload to youtube. - Write a computer program to generate test questions. --- ## His approach to the same math class .pull-left[ <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vA-55wZtLeE" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe> ] .pull-right[ Features: - Each video 5-15 minutes long - Use colors to highlight key points - Self-paced - Can interact with others in comment section ### Why not expand to other subjects? ] ??? 45 minutes lecture is actually 12 minute long. Stuffed with many different things in school. --- ## Khan's curriculum was used by millions for different purposes  --- ## Khan's success brings us to think Traditional learning is ".cyan[one-size-fits-all]" and .cyan[discipline-based]: - Content is not differentiated 教學內容無法因人而異 - Teaching style is not individualized 教學方法無法個性化 - Pace is the same for all students 課堂進度是一致不變的 - Classroom time is limited and fixed 課堂時間有限 -- This standardization in traditional learning also produces: - Compulsory course - Inflexible behavioral regulations - Rigid tracking systems, - Rituals - Public ranking of performance - Humiliation of failure to conform --- ## Traditional learning is created & accepted by the society at a specific time - Technology is limited + Could not deliver high-quality contents to millions at once + No way to give feedbacks or diagnoses learning progress - Amount of people who can receive an education is limited - Type of knowledge we want to teach is limited --- ## Then, Universities were involved One thing university is good at: there is no shortage of pioneers  ??? Course in 2011. --- ## 100,000 students classroom <div style="max-width:854px"><div style="position:relative;height:0;padding-bottom:56.25%"><iframe src="https://embed.ted.com/talks/lang/zh-tw/peter_norvig_the_100_000_student_classroom" width="854" height="480" style="position:absolute;left:0;top:0;width:100%;height:100%" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></div> --- ## What is different this time? Combined these programs are called .red[M]assive .red[O]pen .red[O]nline .red[C]ourse (.red[MOOC] or 慕課 in Chinese) __Characteristics:__ - Free (or at least very cheap) 免費或非常廉價 - Wide-range of topics (anything you want to learn) 囊括大量的知識 - Can be taken by large number of students at the same time 允許大量學生同時上課 - Delivered by top professors in the field (high quality) 由最好的教授講解 - Organized content 課程內容有序 --- background-image: url(https://i1.wp.com/educeleb.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/online-learning-platforms.png?fit=1392%2C1256&ssl=1) background-size: contain --- ## It enables us to This type of new learning uses some of the latest .orange[learning theory]: - .violet[Active learning] 積極學習 through video and interactive exercise - .violet[Gamification] 遊戲化: the use of game thinking and game mechanisms in non-gaming contexts to engage users in solving problems and increase users' self-contribution. - .violet[Self pacing] 自主掌控學習進度 - .violet[Instant feedback] 實時反饋 - .violet[Peer-learning] 同學互助 .footnote[Source: https://www.ted.com/talks/daphne_koller_what_we_re_learning_from_online_education] --- background-image: url(https://saraslistofedresources.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/da3a4e9a-0738-48ab-8343-b68b2b5c2f61-e1535223928521.png) background-size: contain ## Active learning --- background-image: url(https://gdurl.com/9x6V) background-size: contain ## Active learning --- ## Gamification 遊戲化  --- ## Self-pacing & instant feedback An example from Hong Kong University of Science and Technology: http://vis.cse.ust.hk/vismooc/ ??? Starting from 0:34 --- ## Modular curriculum 模塊化課程  --- ## Expand spectrum of learning  --- ## MOOC is not the silver bullet, because it... .violet[Could not replace schools & universities]: - It couldn't solve the motivation problem. - It couldn't solve the social problem (i.e. poverty, social class, etc) - It couldn't solve ethical problem (i.e. cheating, etc) - It didn't change the fact that learning is an extremely sophisticated human behavior -- .violet[Not all subjects are suitable]: - Location dependent knowledge (e.g. globalization) - Subjective knowledge (e.g. history) - Knowledge outside of English --- class: reverse, center, middle ## If MOOC has so much limitation, why is it still important? --- ## Reason 1 Because it has .cyan[democratized learning]: - As learners, we can learn almost anything without physically moving to another country - Competition of providing the best content has been leveled to the global level - Has the potential to break the monopoly of .violet[elite schools & universities] + In fact, some elite universities are pioneers in reducing the barriers of people getting an equivalent university education ??? In a way, MOOC forges a global learning community --- ## Reason 2 Higher education has changed  The token value of a higher education degree is associated with the scarcity of supplies. With more people holding the degree, the exchange value diminishes greatly. --- ### Think Macao is an exception? Net enrollment rate for Macao's youth at higher education? .red[98%].  There is increasingly not meaningful or even feasible to stacking up degrees. So online degree/learning stabs at the credentialism with unique use value. --- ## .red[Summary] New forms of learning has brought walled-off 被牆隔開 knowledge to learners. It is still up to the learner to harness the benefit. Schools & universities will not be replace overnight because they are as much a .violet[social institution] as a learning institution. Universities are at the center of this change both because of its mission (.violet[to create and disseminate] 傳播 knowledge) and changing student body. --- ## Resources Read more on why technology fails to deliver promised change in education: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-11-11/the-false-promise-of-classroom-technology